¸ñÀû: Hearing preservation (HP) in cochlear implantation (CI) is important
to the patients who have residual hearing. Because by using an
electrical acoustic system (EAS), patients can hear a more natural
sound. To preserve residual hearing, trajectory of electrode insertion
is very important. Basal turn (BT) – facial ridge (FR) angle (Choung¡¯s
angle I) predicts the risk of electrode trajectory, and this mechanism
was already published (Otology & Neurotology, 2020. The other factor
determining electrode trajectory is the position of posterior wall of
external auditory canal (EAC) and round window (RW). The purpose of
this study was to analyze of positions and related angles involving
FR, EAC, RW and BT. ¹æ¹ý:This study included 122 patients who underwent cochlear implantation
between 2011 and 2022 and had a preoperative low-frequency pure-tone
average (LFPTA) of 80 dB HL or lower at frequencies of 125 Hz, 250 Hz,
and 500 Hz. The preservation of residual hearing after cochlear
implantation surgery was assessed using the equation developed by
Skarżyński et al. It was classified as follows: complete HP (numerical
scale score [S] > 75%), partial HP (25% ¡Â S < 75%), minimal HP (1% ¡Â S
< 25%), or complete loss (S < 1%). The EAC-FR angle is defined as the
angle between two lines. The first line connects the posterior EAC
wall and the anterior margin of the RW, while the second line connects
the FR and the posterior margin of the RW. °á°ú:Of the 122 LFPTA patients with ¡Â80dB, the preoperative average was
61.9 ¡¾ 16.4 dB. The average age was 39.2 ¡¾ 24.7 years. There were 21
slim straight electrodes, 39 slim straight electrodes from Cochlear,
and 62 slim straight electrodes from MED-EL. The BT-FR angle was
significantly higher in the complete-to-minimal HP group compared to
the hearing loss group one month after surgery. The EAC-FR angle
showed a decreasing trend from the complete to partial, minimal HP,
and hearing loss groups. Notably, there were significant differences
between the groups at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. At 6 months
postoperatively, the EAC-FR angle was highest in the Complete HP group
at 14.78¡Æ, followed by the Partial HP group at 13.99¡Æ, the Minimal HP
group at 12.23¡Æ, and the Hearing Loss group, which had the lowest
angle at 9.82¡Æ. The correlation between the degree of hearing loss and
the EAC-FR angle showed a positive correlation with hearing
preservation. °á·Ð:The EAC-FR angle (Choung¡¯s angle II) which can be measured easily in
axial TBCT images may be useful to predict residual HP after CI. A
larger angle was associated with a higher likelihood of hearing
preservation. Therefore, EAC wall thinning and facial ridge lowering
may help overcome these limitations. Thus, preoperative measurement of
the Choung¡¯s angle I and II may facilitate the establishment of a more
individualized surgical plan. |