| ¹ßÇ¥Çü½Ä :
|
Á¢¼ö¹øÈ£ - 990128 OTOP 5-5 |
| THE COCHLEA SIZE AND THE INSERTION CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STRAIGHT TYPE
COCHLEAR ELECTRODES |
| TODOC CO. LTD., R&D CENTER, SEOUL, REPUBLIC OF KOREA1 DEPARTMENT OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, FIRST CENTRAL HOSPITAL OF MONGOLIA, ULAANBAATAR, MONGOLIA2 DEPARTMENT OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND H&N SURGERY, SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, SEOUL, REPUBLIC OF KOREA3 DEPARTMENT OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, CHUNGNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY SEJONG HOSPITAL4 |
| DOO-HEE KIM,
DOO-HEE KIM1,3, GAN-ERDENE NARANTSOLMON2, MYENG-SIN KANG3, GO-UN CHOE4, GWANG-JIN CHOI1, SOO-WON SHIN1, KYOU-SIK MIN1, MYUNG-WHAN SUH3, AND THE LATE SEUNG-HA OH3
|
¸ñÀû: The human cochlea varies in shape and size depending on the individual,
influencing the extent to which a cochlear implant electrode is
inserted. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between
cochlea size and the insertion characteristics of straight electrodes. ¹æ¹ý:Fresh-frozen temporal bones extracted within 72 hours postmortem were
used for this study. A total of 10 AL20 electrodes and 6 AL23
electrodes were inserted. The AL20 electrode featured an active length
of 20 mm and a pitch of 0.625 mm, and the AL23 electrode had an active
length of 24 mm and a pitch of 0.75 mm. Both electrodes included 32
contacts, with a tip size of 0.45 mm in width and 0.35 mm in height,
and a base size of 0.8 mm in width and 0.6 mm in height. The
electrodes were constructed using platinum-iridium alloy and silicone
elastomer, consistent with commercially available electrodes. A highly
experienced surgeon performed cochlear implant procedures on the
temporal bones, exposing the round window of the cochlea. Electrodes
were inserted slowly, stopping upon encountering resistance, and then
secured with glue. Micro-CT images were acquired to assess cochlea
size and angular insertion depth (AID). Key measurements included
distance A (the maximum distance from the round window to the opposite
cochlea wall), distance B (perpendicular to distance A), and cochlea
height (H). These measurements were analyzed in relation to the
insertion characteristics. °á°ú:The cochlea size measurements for A, B, and H were 9.4 ¡¾ 0.44 mm(mean
¡¾ standard deviation), 7.1 ¡¾ 0.31 mm, and 4.3 ¡¾ 0.40 mm,
respectively. The angular insertion depth of the AL23 electrode was
395.5 ¡¾ 62.3¡Æ, and that of the AL20 electrode was 388.4 ¡¾ 47.9¡Æ.
Positive correlations were observed between A and B (correlation
coefficient, CC = 0.51), A and A/B (CC = 0.43), A and H (CC = 0.23),
and B and H (CC = 0.30). A negative correlation was observed between B
and A/B (CC = -0.46). For the AL23 electrode, AID showed a positive
correlation with B (CC = 0.27) and a negative correlation with H (CC =
-0.60). For the AL20 electrode, AID showed a positive correlation with
A/B (CC = 0.23) and a negative correlation with A (CC = -0.28) and B
(CC = -0.39). °á·Ð:The cochlea size parameters (distance A, B, and H) exhibited positive
correlations with each other. The insertion angle of the AL23
electrode showed a positive correlation with the cochlea distance B
and a negative correlation with the cochlea height. In contrast, the
AL20 electrode demonstrated a negative correlation with A and B, and a
positive correlation with A/B. These findings highlight that even for
straight electrodes, the relationship between cochlea size and
insertion characteristics varies depending on electrode length. |
|