| ¹ßÇ¥Çü½Ä :
|
Á¢¼ö¹øÈ£ - 990093 OTTPP 2-1 |
| FEASIBILITY OF MINIMAL INVERTED J INCISION FOR BAHA ATTRACT
IMPLANTATION |
| DEPARTMENT OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, HOSPITAL RAJA PERMAISURI BAINUN, CITY, MALAYSIA1, DEPARTMENT OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, SEVERANCE HOSPITAL, YONSEI UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, SEOUL, KOREA2 |
| JAMOL ERGASHEV,
JEONG GUM LEE2, GUHAN KUMARASAMY1,2, IN SEOK MOON2
|
¸ñÀû: To evaluate the feasibility of a minimal inverted J incision for
BAHA
Attract Implantation. The classical large incision often results
in
prolonged surgical time and wound complications. Minimal linear
incision can lead to incision scar overlap with the implanted
magnet,
also causing wound complications, magnet instability, and problem
in
external devices attachment. Our novel incision can overcome
drawbacks
of both incisions. ¹æ¹ý:We assessed the outcomes of patients who underwent BAHA Attract
implantation using the Minimal Inverted J incision, which was
designed
to provide adequate exposure while avoid excessive incision.
Surgical
time, wound healing, and implant stability using hearing outcome
were
evaluated and compared to those of patients who underwent the
using
classical incision. °á°ú:Minimal Inverted J incision group and classical incision group
demonstrated no statistical differences in surgical time (32.8¡¾6.3mins
vs. 36.9¡¾ 5.4mins, p=0.0559), postoperative major wound complications
(6.3% vs. 20%, p= 0.176), and hearing outcome (51.8¡¾31.1dB vs 36.9 ¡¾
5.4, p=0.056). Statistically, there was no difference, but the trends
consistently showed that Minimal Inverted J incision group was either
superior or comparable. °á·Ð:Our novel incision technique for BAHA Attract implantation can
addresses
the limitations associated with both the classical and minimal
linear
incision approaches. |
|