Çмú´ëȸ ¹ßÇ¥ ¿¬Á¦ ÃÊ·Ï

¹ßÇ¥Çü½Ä : Á¢¼ö¹øÈ£ - 990093    OTTPP 2-1 
FEASIBILITY OF MINIMAL INVERTED J INCISION FOR BAHA ATTRACT IMPLANTATION
DEPARTMENT OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, HOSPITAL RAJA PERMAISURI BAINUN, CITY, MALAYSIA1, DEPARTMENT OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, SEVERANCE HOSPITAL, YONSEI UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, SEOUL, KOREA2
JAMOL ERGASHEV, JEONG GUM LEE2, GUHAN KUMARASAMY1,2, IN SEOK MOON2
¸ñÀû: To evaluate the feasibility of a minimal inverted J incision for BAHA Attract Implantation. The classical large incision often results in prolonged surgical time and wound complications. Minimal linear incision can lead to incision scar overlap with the implanted magnet, also causing wound complications, magnet instability, and problem in external devices attachment. Our novel incision can overcome drawbacks of both incisions. ¹æ¹ý:We assessed the outcomes of patients who underwent BAHA Attract implantation using the Minimal Inverted J incision, which was designed to provide adequate exposure while avoid excessive incision. Surgical time, wound healing, and implant stability using hearing outcome were evaluated and compared to those of patients who underwent the using classical incision. °á°ú:Minimal Inverted J incision group and classical incision group demonstrated no statistical differences in surgical time (32.8¡¾6.3mins vs. 36.9¡¾ 5.4mins, p=0.0559), postoperative major wound complications (6.3% vs. 20%, p= 0.176), and hearing outcome (51.8¡¾31.1dB vs 36.9 ¡¾ 5.4, p=0.056). Statistically, there was no difference, but the trends consistently showed that Minimal Inverted J incision group was either superior or comparable. °á·Ð:Our novel incision technique for BAHA Attract implantation can addresses the limitations associated with both the classical and minimal linear incision approaches.


[´Ý±â]