¸ñÀû: To evaluate and compare the success rates, complication profiles,
operation duration, and tympanic flap engraftment in endoscopic
transcanal tympanoplasty (ETT) and microscopic-assisted postauricular
tympanoplasty (MPT) for large or subtotal tympanic membrane
perforations. ¹æ¹ý:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 200 patients with large or
subtotal tympanic membrane perforations. Patients were divided into
two equal groups (n=100):
Group 1: Endoscopic Transcanal Tympanoplasty (ETT)
Group 2: Microscopic-Assisted Postauricular Tympanoplasty (MPT)
Outcome measures included:
Tympanic membrane closure rate
Incidence of postoperative complications
Mean operative time
Tympanic flap engraftment rate
Statistical analysis was performed to compare the results between the
groups. °á°ú:The success rate of tympanic membrane closure in the ETT group was
96.2%, compared to 85.6% in the MPT group.
The ETT group had a significantly shorter operative time.
Postoperative complications, such as pain and infection, were lower in
the ETT group.
Tympanic flap engraftment rates were higher in the ETT group, indicating
better tissue integration and healing. °á·Ð:Endoscopic transcanal tympanoplasty demonstrates higher success rates,
shorter operative times, and fewer complications compared to
microscopic-assisted tympanoplasty in patients with large or subtotal
tympanic membrane perforations. These findings support the adoption of
endoscopic techniques as a preferred approach in suitable cases. |