| ¹ßÇ¥Çü½Ä :
|
Á¢¼ö¹øÈ£ - 990054 OTTPP 1-3 |
| PREDICTION OF RECOVERY PROGNOSIS AFTER TREATMENT THROUGH DEEP LEARNING
OF GRADE CHANGES IN BELL¡¯S PALSY |
| 1DEPARTMENT OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, HANYANG UNIVERSITY, SEOUL, REPUBLIC OF KOREA. 2DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS, KYUNGPOOK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, DAEGU, REPUBLIC OF KOREA 3DEPARTMENT OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, SEOUL, REPUBLIC OF KOREA 4DEPARTMENT OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, KANGNAM SACRED HEART HOSPITAL, HALLYM UNIVERSITY, SEOUL, SOUTH KOREA 5DEPARTMENT OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BORAMAE MEDICAL CENTER, SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, SEOUL, SOUTH KOREA |
| SANG-YOON HAN,
SANG-YOON HAN1, JEONG RYE PARK2, HEONJEONG OH3, SUNG-MIN PARK4, JONGYOOK PARK2, YOUNG HO KIM3, 5
|
¸ñÀû: To evaluate the current status of facial nerve palsy (FNP) and predict
prognosis, various evaluation tools have been developed. Recently, deep
learning algorithms have emerged as promising tools for predicting
clinical outcomes of various disease. This study aims to predict the
early prognosis of FNP by leveraging deep learning model. ¹æ¹ý:We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records of FNP patients
with data on age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, initial FNP grades,
and follow-up information. Among them, 279 patients with at least three
FNP grade evaluations within 30 days of the first visit and one
evaluation between 30 and 300 days were included. Subjects were divided
into a training set to develop deep-learning models and a test set for
validation, using January 1, 2024, as the cut-off. A long short-term
memory neural network predicted FNP grades at the fourth visit, while a
support vector machine predicted acceptable recovery. °á°ú:The classification models, considering H-B grades in serial 2 visits
until 30 days after first visit, age, gender, hypertension, diabetes,
and delayed treatment, showed an accuracy of 0.903, a recall of 0.991,
and an f1-score of 0.944. The accuracy, recall, and f1-score were 0.8,
0.882, and 0.882, respectively in validation data. Additionally, the
classification model achieved an accuracy of 0.848, a recall of 0.946,
and an f1-score of 0.898 for individuals who did not recover within 30
days of the first visit. Furthermore, regression model was established
using age and sex, along with two of hypertension, diabetes, and
delayed treatment (treatment starting more than 7 days after onset),
were used as features. Model (hypertension, diabetes) 1 had a standard
error of 0.4575 and a validation prediction error of 0.4629, while
Model 2 (hypertension, delayed treatment) showed a worse standard
error (0.5225) and validation prediction error (0.6034) than Model 1.
Model 3 (diabetes and delayed treatment) had a standard error of
0.4525 and a validation prediction error of 0.6095. For individuals
who did not recover within 30 days of the first visit, the standard
errors of Model 1, Model 2, and Model 3 were 0.6524, 0.6384, and
0.6411 in the origin data. °á·Ð:This study demonstrated that changes in FNP grades can be successfully
estimated using information from serial FNP visits and clinically
important features. Given that FNP results in significant social and
emotional costs, appropriate intervention is necessary based on the
estimated prognosis. Our deep learning model may assist clinicians in
predicting prognosis and providing consultation and treatment for FNP
patients. |
|