¹ßÇ¥Çü½Ä :
|
Á¢¼ö¹øÈ£ - 980316 RHOP 1-3 |
SIMULATION TRAINING IN ENDOSCOPIC ENDONASAL SURGERY USING VIRTUAL
SIMULATION AND 3D PRINTED MODELS |
DEPARTMENT OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, HALLYM UNIVERSITY DONGTAN SACRED HEART HOSPITAL©ö, DEPARTMENT OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL©÷, DEPARTMENT OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL©ø |
SUN A HAN,
SUN A HAN©ö, SEUNG CHEOL HAN©÷, SUNG-WOO CHO©ø, TAE-BIN WON©÷
|
¸ñÀû: Surgical simulation training may enhance the trainees¡¯ understanding of
the anatomy and performance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the
educational value of surgical simulation training in endoscopic
endonasal surgery using virtual simulation (VS) program and three-
dimensional (3D) printed models. ¹æ¹ý:This prospective trial enrolled a total of 20 otorhinolaryngology
(ORL) trainees including residents and fellows. Informed consent was
obtained from all trainees, and they were randomly allocated to one of
two surgical simulation training programs. Group 1 performed
simulation on the VS model first, then on the 3D model, while Group 2
performed sinus surgery on the 3D model only. Before performing the
surgical simulation, the trainees were briefed on the computed
tomography (CT) scan used to construct the VS and 3D models, the
surgical tasks needed to complete sinus surgery. A tutor with ORL
board oversaw all training and measured time to completion of tasks.
The trainees completed questionnaires on the educational value,
anatomic fidelity of the models, and level of confidence after
training. °á°ú:Ten trainees were each randomized into group 1 and group 2,
respectively. There was no difference in sex, mean age and length of ORL
training between groups. Trainees in group 1 evaluated the educational
value of the program (simulation on VS model preceding 3D model) more
highly than those in group 2 who only dissected the 3D models (p<0.01).
Proportion of trainees who answered that the program was educational
enough to replace cadaver dissection was higher in group 1 (60% vs. 20%,
p=0.17). Although there was no significant difference in time needed to
perform tasks in the 3D model between groups, group 1 expressed higher
level of confidence after simulation training (p<0.01). °á·Ð:VS programs and 3D models are both helpful in simulation training for
endoscopic sinus surgery, and a combination of both may be synergistic
in providing better simulation training for ORL trainees in endoscopic
sinus surgery. |
|