¹ßÇ¥Çü½Ä :
|
Á¢¼ö¹øÈ£ - 890227 HNOP-65 |
Cost Benefit Analysis of Intra Operative Frozen Section for Surgical
Margins in Oral Cancer |
Dept. of Head and Neck Surgery, Homi Bhabha National Univ. Tata Memorial Hosp. |
Aseem MISHRA,
Sourav DATTA, Yogesh MORE, Pranav INGOLE, Aseem MISHRA, Jaiprakash AGARWAL,Shubhada KANE, Poonam JOSHI,Sudhir NAIR, Anil D'CRUZ, Pankaj CHATURVEDI
|
¸ñÀû: Frozen section (FS) is routinely used to identify microscopic
spread of disease beyond tumor edge that is clinically occult.
However almost all studies suggest that use of FS does not impact
the survival. Besides there is hardly any publications on
prevalence of such Microscopic spread. We evaluated the impact of
microscopic spread on the margin status. Our primary aim was to
study the cost benefit analysis of FS in the assessment of
margins. ¹æ¹ý:This is a retrospective study of 1311 consecutive patients, operated
for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma from January 2012 to October
2013. FS was performed in 1237 (94.3%) patients. The gross and
microscopic margin status of each patient was extracted from
electronic medical records. The cost estimates were performed to
calculate the expenditure on FS and also on adjuvant treatment
resulting from inadequate margins. Activity based cost analysis was
performed to estimate indirect institution associated expenses for
FS. °á°ú:Microscopic spread changed the gross margin status in 5.2% patients.
FS was beneficial in 1 out of 43 patients (2.3%) to achieve tumor
free margin and it affected the adjuvant treatment plan in 1 out of
137(0.7%) patients. The total cost of entire cohort was USD 227814.2.
Total costs for adjuvant CT-RT and adjuvant RT in our centre were USD
3750 and USD 3016.7 per patient. FS saved USD 18666.7 as additional
cost of adjuvant treatment in total 9 patients in entire cohort. Thus
additional expenditure due to FS is USD 209147.5. The cost benefit
ratio of FS was 121. Gross examination alone could have identified
majority of the inadequate margins. °á·Ð:Use of Frozen section for the assessment of surgical margin bears
poor cost benefit ratio. Meticulous gross examination of the entire
surgical specimen is pivotal in identifying majority of inadequate
margins. |
|