¸ñÀû: The additional hearing-aid (HA) benefit on speech-recognition
performance over amplification itself remains uncertain. The aim of
this study was to evaluate whether HA could improve auditory
spectral resolution, temporal resolution and speech-recognition
ability in quiet or noise background. ¹æ¹ý:Subjects included 20 elderly listeners (58.7 years, 8 males, 12
females) using HA more than 3 months (36.0 months, 11 unilateral
HA, 9 bilateral HA) in everyday life and their aided performances
and unaided performances were compared. Four different
psychoacoustic measurements were performed 1) spectral-ripple
discrimination (SRD), 2) temporal modulation detection (TMD), 3)
speech discrimination score (SDS) in quiet and 4) speech
recognition threshold (SRT) in white noise. All test signals were
presented from a loudspeaker located 1m in front in a sound-
attenuating booth at their MCLs in either unaided or aided
condition. °á°ú:There were no significant differences of SRD thresholds, TMD thresholds between unaided condition and aided condition. In contrast, higher SDS and lower SRT in noise (i.e., poorer speech perception ability) were showed in aided condition compared to unaided condition (Wilcoxons signed rank test, p< 0.05). There were no significant differences of HA benefits (aided minus unaided performances) measured on 4 different tests between unilateral HA wearer and bilateral HA wearer. Among various factors, the benefit of SRT in noise only showed significant correlation with users satisfaction measured by IOI-HA (International Outcome Inventory for HA) (Multiple regression analysis, Standardized ¥â Coefficient = - 0.795). °á·Ð:There were the additional HA benefits on speech-recognition
abilities under both quiet and noise condition at least in test
booth. However, this was not true on auditory spectral resolution
or temporal resolution. |