| ¹ßÇ¥Çü½Ä :
|
Á¢¼ö¹øÈ£ - 10008 Audio 1-5 |
| Speech Intelligibility Improvement Effect of a Soundbar Equipped
with a
Hearing-Aid Algorithm |
| DEPARTMENT OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE SENSORY ORGAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE, SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER, SEOUL, REPUBLIC OF KOREA,JD SOLUTION |
| DEIDDA GIANNI,
CHAE-YEON YU, MOO KYUN PARK,SIN LYUL LEE,CHAN ILL PARK, YOUNG HO JE,JONG SUB HAN
|
¸ñÀû: This study aimed to explore whether the use of a soundbar
equipped with
a hearing-aid algorithm (M1 mode) helps improve speech
intelligibility
in individuals with hearing loss. The objective was to evaluate
the
clinical feasibility of a new type of soundbar-based listening
assistance designed to support clearer speech perception in home
environments. ¹æ¹ý:An interim analysis was conducted with adult participants with
hearing
loss whose native language was Korean (average hearing threshold
in the
better ear ¡Ã 26 dB HL). After screening through otoscopic
examination,
pure-tone audiometry, and speech audiometry, participants
underwent
sound-field pure-tone audiometry, sound-field speech audiometry,
and
speech intelligibility testing in noise under two conditions: the
soundbar¡¯s general mode and the M1 mode. In addition, subjective
preference was evaluated using the Comparison Category Rating
(CCR; −3
to +3 scale) with news audio that included background noise. °á°ú:In sound-field pure-tone audiometry, the mean threshold was 51.24 dB SPL
in the general mode and 47.5 dB SPL in M1 mode, showing an average
improvement of 3.7 dB SPL. In sound-field speech audiometry, performance
improved from 80.6% in general mode to 84.0% in M1 mode, an increase of
3.4%. In speech intelligibility testing in noise, scores improved from
69.4% in general mode to 73.9% in M1 mode, a 4.5% increase. The CCR
survey showed an average score of 1.43, indicating an overall preference
for M1 mode. °á·Ð:The M1 mode soundbar equipped with a hearing-aid algorithm
demonstrated consistent improvements in sound-field hearing
thresholds
and speech intelligibility compared with the general mode.
Subjective
evaluations also showed a positive preference for the M1 mode.
These
findings suggest the potential of this device as an assistive
solution
to support speech transmission for individuals with hearing loss
in
home environments. However, individual differences related to
acoustic
preference should be considered. |
|