| ¹ßÇ¥Çü½Ä :
|
Á¢¼ö¹øÈ£ - 10005 SLP01 |
| Influence of Spectral Boundary on the Clinical Usefulness of
Low/High
Spectral Ratio in Voice Analysis |
| DEPARTMENT OF SPEECH PATHOLOGY & AUDIOLOGY, GRADUATE SCHOOL OF HALLYM UNIVERSITY, CHUNCHEON, REPUBLIC OF KOREA1, DEPARTMENT OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, DONGTAN SACRED HEART HOSPITAL, HALLYM UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, HWASEONG, REPUBLIC OF KOREA2, DEPARTMENT OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, YONSEI UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, SEOUL, REPUBLIC OF KOREA3, DIVISION OF SPEECH PATHOLOGY AND AUDIOLOGY, RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF AUDIOLOGY AND SPEECH PATHOLOGY, COLLEGE OF NATURAL SCIENCES, HALLYM UNIVERSITY, CHUNCHEON, REPUBLIC OF KOREA4 |
| BORAM KEUM,
BORAM KEUM1,2, HYUN JI LIM1, JI HEE KIM1, JAE-YOL LIM3, HYE RIM CHAE3, SEUNG JIN LEE4*
|
¸ñÀû: The low-to-high spectral ratio(SR) reflects spectral energy
distribution
of the voice. In clinical and research settings, SR typically
uses fixed
4 kHz cutoff. However, evidence is limited on whether this cutoff
optimally distinguishes pathological voices. This study examined
whether
1-6 kHz SR cutoff adjustment enhances diagnostic sensitivity
across
speech tasks. ¹æ¹ý:Sustained vowel phonation(SV) and sentence reading(CS) samples
collected
from individuals with normal voices and those with voice
disorders. SR
values computed for cutoff frequencies ranging from 1 to 6 kHz.
Two-way
ANOVA with group and gender factors compared group differences
across
cutoff points. Correlations between SR and perceptual severity
ratings
analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) analyses
evaluated
diagnostic utility at each cutoff frequency. °á°ú:Group differences and classification performance of SR varied
significantly depending on cutoff frequency. Certain cutoff points
showed higher diagnostic sensitivity than conventional 4 kHz reference.
Vowel tasks showed greatest discrimination at 1 kHz cutoff, while
sentence tasks showed optimal performance at 5-6 kHz. Correlational
analyses revealed SR-perceptual severity relationship depended on cutoff
frequency, showing positive correlations at lower points and negative at
higher ones. °á·Ð:The diagnostic sensitivity of SR is not fixed to a single
frequency
cutoff, but varies considerably depending on the chosen cutoff
frequency. These findings challenge the traditional use of a
single SR
cutoff and suggest that task-specific and purpose-driven
adjustments
of the frequency cutoff can enhance the clinical utility of SR in
voice assessment. |
|